By now, you’ll have surely heard of Bonnie Blue: a woman who is no stranger to online infamy.
The 26-year-old OnlyFans creator is notorious for her extreme sex stunts, including breaking the world record for sleeping with 1,000 men in a day. She’s also toured university freshers weeks in the UK and visited Cancun, a popular spring break destination for US students, offering ‘barely legal’ men (aged at least 18) the opportunity to sleep with her in exchange for their consent to be filmed and appear in her OF content.
Her stunts have gained her a substantial online following — and attracted considerable backlash. Speaking to Cosmopolitan UK earlier this year, Blue pushed back at critics, suggesting that her stunts are a way of educating participants about sex. “If I had a child, I’d be sending them to one of these events,” she said. “I provide a safe, judgement-free environment with security-scanned ID and a breathalyser test. And [participants] are doing something good for society by putting an educational video out there. What part of that is dangerous?”
Now, the platform on which she’s made her name (and big bucks — specifically, an eye-watering $2.1 million per month) has thrown a spanner in her controversial success: OnlyFans has banned Bonnie Blue.
Why was Bonnie Blue banned from OnlyFans?
Earlier this month, Blue promised to top her 1,000 men in a day feat: announcing a stunt she called the ‘Bonnie Blue petting zoo’ which would allow members of the public to touch her, or have intercourse with her, while she was tied up in a glass box.
The challenge was due to take place tomorrow (15 June), but has since been cancelled due to online outrage. And this time, the controversy has caught the attention of OnlyFans, who’ve shut down Blue’s account.
When we reached out for comment, an OnlyFans spokesperson told Cosmopolitan UK: “Extreme ‘challenge’ content is not available on OnlyFans and is not permitted under our Acceptable Use Policy and Terms of Service. Any breach of our Terms of Service results in content or account deactivation.”
According to The Metro, a contact at the platform also confirmed that the ban was “permanent”.
Cosmopolitan UK can confirm that when attempting to access Bonnie Blue’s two OnlyFans accounts (https://onlyfans.com/bonnieblue_xoxo and https://onlyfans.com/bonnieblue_xo) both pages have been taken down.
Blue has not yet made any statement on social media or to the press, but she has updated the link in her Instagram bio so that it directs to her Fansly account, where she began posting on 11 June.
Fansly is an alternative, subscription-based platform to OnlyFans, and her page currently stands at 5.5k followers, which is a huge dip from the 300,000 OnlyFans followers she had earlier in 2025 – suggesting her income has taken a major hit.
What do other OnlyFans creators have to say about the Bonnie Blue ban?
Blue — alongside the OnlyFans creator Lily Philips, who embarked on her own challenge to sleep with 100 men in a day — has been the subject of plenty of column inches, which paint her online presence as a cause, rather than a symptom, of misogyny and sexism.
However, while there is plenty of spirited online discourse about Blue from those outside the sex industry, what do other online sex workers think? So far, Blue has been criticised by Sophie Rain, the creator of the popular OnlyFans collective Bop House, who said: “It’s no longer women empowerment. It’s shock value, and she’s making a joke out of all of us.”
Regardless of individuals’ personal feelings around Blue, the ban has taken place amid a time of uncertainty for OnlyFans creators. It was revealed in late May that the platform’s owner, Fenix International, was in talks to be sold for $8 billion (£5.9 billion) to a consortium headed up by US investment firm Forest Road Company.
Whenever a company is set to change hands, it raises questions about its future direction. However, with the increasing censorship of online pornography — which, in recent years, has seen the likes of Pornhub exit France and be blocked in multiple US states due to age verification controversies — the stakes could be even higher for OnlyFans NSFW content creators as they navigate uncertain territory.
Now, speaking exclusively to Cosmopolitan UK, three OnlyFans creators and online sex workers weigh in with their opinions about the news of Blue’s permanent ban.
“Anytime a performer loses access to their main source of income and primary platform, it’s a sad day. Especially in 2025, when our payment processors and platforms are threatened by incoming censorship laws disguised as ‘adult verification’.
Bonnie is privileged that she is in an income bracket where she has support in place to protect herself in case of removal from one of her platforms. She also has the ability to use her network and brand name to spread the word that she was banned. Most models, who often get banned or reprimanded for much less, do not have those options. This means they’re less likely to pivot easily via funnelling fans to new platforms or regaining account access due to press or protest.
I think Bonnie [has made] the OnlyFans platform enough money that the choice to ban her is more about the OF brand image than anything else. I’m sure the press she’s been acquiring for her ‘extreme’ sexual stunts is counterintuitive to the brand OnlyFans has been trying to reign in the past couple of years. The platform has been investing heavily into their safe-for-work avenues, like OFTV, so I’m guessing that factors into their decision making. Especially if the company plans on selling, taking on investors, or simply dealing with payment processors and banks.”
“Every respectable platform takes consent, privacy, and age verification very seriously. As OnlyFans creators we are all at risk if we violate their rules, and I suspect there were many rules violated with her type of content.
I think her publicity stunts have probably put pressure onto OnlyFans and other similar platforms to enforce their rules more.
Honestly as an older woman and mum, who had a full career before my success on OnlyFans, I feel bad for [Bonnie Blue]. Clearly I believe in a woman having the power to do what she wants — and in no way am shaming her, or anyone — but I don’t see this ending well for her or the others that are competing to outdo each other with these extremes.”
“I’m not surprised [Bonnie Blue] has been banned; I could see it from a mile off. In my opinion, what she does is escorting [‘escort’ and ‘escorting’ are restricted words on OnlyFans, and the platform’s terms of service discourage any mention of creators and fans meeting in person]. She’s agreeing to meet these men to have intercourse and they are paying in consent to post on OnlyFans.
OnlyFans is trying to sell their platform right now. If she’s the poster girl for OnlyFans, it makes sense for her to be banned: she doesn’t have much backing from the general public, except for sadistic men who have pent-up rage against women.
It sucks because it’s likely that any woman who has followed in her suit will get banned. You don’t want people to lose their income, all of these girls have worked hard to get where they are. Bonnie has done some things that will change her for the rest of her life and it’s unfortunate that she’s losing what makes her thrive and survive.
Bonnie, though, has taken rage baiting to the extreme, saying things like ‘you need to expect [men are] going to go elsewhere if you aren’t sleeping with them’. These are the repercussions if you’re going to push boundaries like these in a society where women are so pushed down behind the scenes.”
Cosmopolitan UK has reached out to Bonnie Blue for comment.
Megan Wallace (they/them) is Cosmopolitan UK’s Former Sex and Relationships Editor covering sexual pleasure, sex toys, LGBTQIA+ identity, dating and romance. They have covered sexuality and relationships for over five years and are the founder of the PULP zine, which publishes essays on culture and sex. In their spare time, they can be found exploring the London kink scene and planning dates on Feeld.
This post was originally published on this site be sure to check out more of their content.
