ORLANDO, Fla (WKMG/CNN/CNN Newsource/WKRC) – A judge reached a verdict in a mother of two’s lawsuit against a school district over a controversy involving OnlyFans.
According to WKMG, an Orange County judge on January 29 ruled against 33-year-old Victoria Triece, who sued Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) for $1 million in 2023 after district officials informed her in 2021 that she was banned from volunteering in the classroom at Sand Lake Elementary School.
The outlet reported that Triece’s relationship with the district deteriorated after explicit images from her OnlyFans were sent to the school principal by an individual who identified only as a concerned parent.
Documents seen my WKMG reportedly state that the principal contacted her direct supervisor to seek guidance on the situation, with the email in question never sent or shown to anyone else until public records requests were made to the district. Those requests were filed about the same time that a press release was published by Triece’s attorney, and the news began to spread thereafter, per the outlet.
At the time, Triece said that her personal life was none of the school’s business, adding that she was “humiliated,” per The Daily Mail, which noted that Triece has more than 148,000 followers on her primary Instagram account and around 264,000 followers on TikTok.
“Nobody has the right to judge what other people do for a living. I feel judged, and so isolated,” Triece said when speaking to WESH, adding that she launched her OnlyFans account because she didn’t want to work a 9 to 5 any longer.
“I wanted to still be involved. I went through a crazy breakup. I wanted to still go to school with them and be with them 24/7 and be as involved in their lives as I could be without being away from them. They’re everything to me,” Triece told WESH.
The district complied and sent the anonymous email with the images attached, according to WKMG, citing court docs.
According to the station, Triece accused the school board of “sexual cyberharassment” for handing over her images following the public records requests. The judge ruled against that assertion, however, because it was not a case of “revenge porn,” according to documents obtained by WKMG.
“The record also shows that OCPS’s disclosure was for a legitimate purpose and a person is only liable under the statute if the disclosure by that person was for a non-legitimate purpose,” the documents state, per WKMG.
The judge ultimately ruled that Triece did “not have a right to volunteer at the school or appeal her removal,” adding that she “did not request to file, nor actually filed an appeal of the removal decision.”
Triece did file a petition for a writ of mandamus, but it was rejected, per The Mail.
In the ruling, the judge said the school’s volunteer program “does not include any language that confers any right or benefit upon an individual to participate in the program, to remain in the program, or to appeal a removal decision,” according to the publication.
“The record before the Court does not contain any evidence that supports Plaintiff’s assertion that her right to raise her child has been constitutionally impaired,” the resolution states, per the outlet.
This post was originally published on this site be sure to check out more of their content.
